Difficulty Of Love In A Midsummer Night's Dream
Love's Difficulty In A Midsummer Night's Dream
William Shakespeare is often acclaimed with writing the most memorable and magnificent tragedies in the English language including the thoroughly praised and popular works of Hamlet, Macbeth, and Romeo and Juliet. Amidst these great tales of tragedy, one may overlook and underestimate Shakespeare's lively and intriguing comedies. Amongst these comedies lies A Midsummer Night's Dream, a hilarious tale that queerly merges subplots of intricate love, daft lovers, ethereal fairies, and amateur play junkies. The story takes place in a mythological-like Athens, Greece and centers around four young, enamored Athenians: Hermia, Lysander, Helena, and Demetrius. All four lovers are involved in complicated romance: Hermia and Lysander are in love, Demetrius loves Hermia, and Helena loves Demetrius. Conversely, the romance becomes manipulated further when characters journey into a forest near a fairy kingdom-they indirectly encounter the magic effects of quarreling fairy monarchs, Oberon and Titania. Oberon's mischievous jester, Puck becomes the hilarious source of trouble in the play as he takes Cupid's Flower (a flower which causes one to fall in love with the first person they see) and complicates the lovers' relationships by causing both Lysander and Demetrius to fall in love with Helena. Additionally, the impish sprite uses the flower to make fairy queen Titania to briefly fall in love with Bottom, an "ass headed" man whom Puck has magically transformed into an ass. Ultimately, being a comedy, the story ends on a happy note: Puck turns Bottom back into a human and returns him to his player companions; Titania's humorous and embarrassing love spell is lifted, and she and Oberon end their quarrel; the lovers are correctly matched with the ironic help of Puck and Cupid's Flower- Hermia with Lysander, and Helena with Demetrius- and the four lovers wed contently. Through the obscurity and whirlwind of absurdity, excitement and humorous conflict in the story, the serious lessons of the complexity of love appear to be ever present. Although Shakespeare regards the play as a "weak and idle theme" that is "no more real than a dream" (V. i. 419-420), A Midsummer Night's Dream nonetheless embodies and emphasizes the important lesson and theme that is love's difficulty.
The difficulty of love that A Midsummer Night's Dream exemplifies is foreshadowed early on in the storyline. In the first act, Hermia and Lysander face obstacles regarding their true love-Hermia's father, Egeus, does not approve of...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%
Central Theme of Love in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream696 words - 3 pages Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream central theme of love A common theme in literature is love. Love can take hold in an instant and can make you do things you never would have done otherwise. Love appears in several different ways in Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Hermia and Lysander show true love, while Helena demonstrates unrequited love. Titania and Bottom presents us with magic love. In the play, love is also the cause of a...
A Midsummer Night's Dream: Love Essay536 words - 2 pages Love, or what is more commonly known as love, can take hold in an instant and feel very much like magic that is being put over you. It can make you do things that you would never of done and makes you feel like your floating in air. It hits you without you knowing that it's going to happen and there is nothing you can do to stop it. That is what A
A Midsummer Night's Dream: Love In All Its Variations1608 words - 6 pages There is a diversity of ways in which one may perhaps view or even undertake love. Often, it is explored as one of the most serious experiences of life; however, it may also be treated as a sort of madness. William Shakespeare's play A Midsummer Night's Dream is a comedy that presents love in all its variations whilst embarking upon an evident comic element which...
Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare1115 words - 4 pages Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare In midsummer night dream love is portrait in different ways . Many of the characters fall in and out of love with each other. The term lovers is used in the play to mean the four lovers Demetrius, Hermia, Helena and Lysander. They behave as individuals in the play, they also act as a group when they represent the theme of young love. There are different...
True Love in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream2999 words - 12 pages True Love in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream I have been studying A Midsummer Night’s Dream and exploring how the characters within this play deal with love and the consequences resulting from falling in love. I will be answering the question asked by providing quotes and examples of Shakespeare’s technique in showing that ‘The course of true love never did run smooth’ as well as providing answers as to...
A Midsummer Night's Dream Essay: Aspects of Love777 words - 3 pages Love in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream Love is a very inaccurate word, as it can be used in many different ways. It can be used to describe an object which one particularly likes, or to describe ones feelings towards a person. However it does not rest at just these two points. Love for someone can be in a material sense (sexual), or in a more moral sense for example. Some of the various aspects of...
A Comparison of Romantic Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream, The Tempest, and Twelfth Night1626 words - 7 pages Romantic Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream, The Tempest, and Twelfth Night In all of Shakespeare's plays, there is a definitive style present, a style he perfected. From his very first play (The Comedy of Errors) to his very last (The Tempest), he uses unique symbolism and descriptive poetry to express and explain the actions and events he writes about. Twelfth Night, The Tempest and A Midsummer Night's Dream are all tragicomedies...
The Theme of True Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare1060 words - 4 pages The Theme of True Love in A Midsummer Night's Dream by William Shakespeare The overriding theme of the play "A Midsummer Night's Dream" by William Shakespeare deals with the nature of love. Though true love seems to be held up as an ideal, false love is mostly what we are shown. Underneath his frantic comedy, Shakespeare seems to be asking the questions all lovers ask in the midst of their confusion: How do we know when love is real? How...
Different Aspects of Love Presented in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream3605 words - 14 pages Different Aspects of Love Presented in William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream Lysander + Hermia = True love? Sexual Attraction (Lust) ------------------------------------------------------- Titania + Oberon = Love or hate (Married) Helena + Demetrius = One sided (Unrequited) Hippolyta + Theseus = Stable Love (Mutual love and respect) Titania + Bottom = Unrequited and magical (fake) Egeus +...
"A Midsummer Night's Dream"683 words - 3 pages A Midsummer Night's DreamIn Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" the mortal teenagecharacters fall in love foolishly, and the character Bottom states, "Owhat fools...
A Midsummer Night's Dream1904 words - 8 pages A Midsummer Night's Dream Theseus - The Duke of Athens. Theseus Discusses with Hippolyta that he is anxious for their wedding. He complains that the days don't pass quick enough, he is too anxious to wait. Tells Hermia that she can either die or become a nun...
In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare plays with the themes of love, art, imagination, and dreaming to forge an overall meaning for his work. His play within a play, found in Act V, expands on his themes and portrays the relationship between the audience and the performers on stage. Specifically, Quince’s disordered prologue to the play mirrors the distorted reality characterizing the dreamy, nighttime woods; overall, the interjected play underscores Shakespeare’s larger aim of exhibiting the necessity of imagination and dreaming to the maintenance of loving relationships and to the creation of art.
As Quince introduces the play, the audience realizes his failure to correctly punctuate his statements. By utilizing incorrect grammar, Quince’s words take on a whole new meaning. He innocently transforms a courteous introduction into a rather offensive preface. As expected, Theseus proves highly critical of Quince’s disorganized dialogue, proclaiming “This fellow doth not stand upon points” (5.1.118). Later, he adds, “His speech was like a tangled chain – nothing/ impaired, but all disordered” (5.1.124-125). Theseus reveals that by using incorrect grammar, Quince unknowingly speaks what he does not mean; essentially, he speaks an untruth.
Theseus seems bothered by such untruth, relating it to a “tangled chain,” or a web of lies. In this instance, Theseus’ character emerges as one decidedly reliant on truth and fact. He rejects anything fanciful, preferring physical, proven knowledge. In other words, he stands in opposition to the poet, the artist who transcends the material world in order to make sense of the supernatural world. Shakespeare emphasizes such aspects of Theseus’ character to contrast Theseus and his world of facts to the world of the poet, the world of creativity, dreams, and fanciful notions. Of course, In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Athens represents the physically grounded world of facts, while the woods represent the metaphysical world of the poet’s imagination.
In the first scene of Act V, Theseus further reveals that he does not believe in the fantasy world of the woods. He fails to trust in the seemingly fanciful tales of the lovers and rejects all notions of magic in the woods. He contends, “I never may believe / These antique fables, nor these fairy toys” (5.1.2-3). Just as he rejects Quince’s “lies” in the prologue, Theseus rejects what he supposes to be the lies of the lovers. Therefore, the disordered nature of Quince’s speech mirrors the distorted, dream-like world of the woods. Theseus considers both falsities, since they misrepresent or fail to adhere to the “rules” of his factual world. In the first instance, Quince employs the English language, which Theseus comprehends, but his sentence structure yields an entirely different meaning. Quince’s true meaning, while capable of being deduced, is initially concealed. In the second instance, Theseus finds himself completely unable to comprehend the woods, the realm of imagination and dreams.
In effect, by rejecting both Quince’s prologue and the woods, Theseus rejects the imagination and creative energies of the artist, both of which abound in the woods. He fails to recognize that using words in novel, unexpected, and humorous ways can develop into a form of art in its own right. Thus, although Quince distorts his intended meaning, his words still represent his own original, creative art form. Theseus discards this notion, along with the realm of the artist, the woods. Moreover, in failing to place any stock in imagination or dreams, Theseus unwittingly removes any hope for romantic love.
Indeed, his love life emerges as entirely devoid of any of the truly romantic or dreamy qualities of love. Throughout the play, Shakespeare portrays how the experience of love often seems like a dreamlike experience and cannot be proven, as Theseus would like, with facts and rational arguments. For instance, the relationship between Hermia and Lysander seems quite romantic at the beginning of the play, as the young lovers escape to the woods to elope in secret. Likewise, at the end of the play, even the newly formed relationship between Helena and Demetrius closely parallels the ideals of romantic love.
The scene in Act V clearly echoes Shakespeare’s idea of love, presented in multiple parts of the play. Perhaps the greatest example of the dream-like qualities of love emerges in the awakening of Titania to Bottom, with whom she immediately falls in love. For Titania, real life becomes a dream. Upon first observing Bottom, even in his transformed shape, she exclaims, “Mine ear is much enamoured of thy note; / So is mine eye enthrallèd to thy shape; And thy fair virtue’s force perforce doth move me / On the first view to say, to swear, I love thee” (3.1.122-125). Titania’s language emerges as flowing and poetic; she ends in a sing-song rhyming couplet, supplicating her lover. Shakespeare emphasizes the poetic qualities of the language of love; he additionally exaggerates the dream-like nature of love in Titania’s awakening and immediate falling in love. Even Bottom initially doubts her instantaneous love, but eventually admits that “reason and love keep little company together nowadays” (3.1.127-128). Bottom upholds that reason and love cannot exist together. Theseus’ world of reason and facts cannot coexist with the dreamlike and poetic world of love in the woods.
Consequently, the relationship between Theseus and Hippolyta stands in sharp contrast to any of the other lovers in the play. Theseus admits at the very beginning of the play that he “wooed thee [Hippolyta] with the sword” (1.1.16). His marriage exhibits inequality as he assumes a domineering role. Furthermore, Theseus woos Hippolyta with the sword and not with the poetic language of love, unlike the other lovers in the play. Theseus attempts to keep his world of reason separate from the world of romantic love.
Interestingly, in Act V, Hippolyta voices a desire for, or at least an attraction to, the romantic love which Hermia and Helena experience. In response to Theseus’ comment concerning his disbelief in the lovers’ stories, Hippolyta argues, “But all the story of the night told over, / And all their minds transfigured so together, / More witnesseth than fancy’s image, / And grows to something of great constancy” (5.1.23-26). Hippolyta seems to want to believe the lover’s tales; she wants to trust in their romantic notions. In an attempt to persuade Theseus, she uses the rational argument that because all the lovers experience the same transforming power, their experiences do not represent mere figments of the imagination. Instead, she argues, they prove factual in nature. Hippolyta uses reason to relay a desire for love, but she only uses reason in order to better supplicate her husband, a man of reason.
In this way, Hippolyta seems very much attracted to the world of dreams and romantic love, which Shakespeare designates as the woods. While Theseus denies such a world, he ironically gives an accurate description of the poet at the beginning of Act V: “The poet’s eye, in a fine frenzy rolling, Doth glance from heaven to earth, from earth to heaven, / And as imagination bodies forth / The forms of things unknown, the poet’s pen / Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing / A local habitation” (5.1.12-17). In effect, Theseus describes the particular ability of the poet to transcend material boundaries, give substance to the abstract, and provide words for the otherwise unexplainable. Although he later condemns the imaginative notions of the poet as “tricks,” Theseus nevertheless seems to grasp the role of the poet. While Quince unknowingly speaks untruth, Theseus unknowingly speaks a truth which he quickly attempts to dismiss.
Even earlier in Act V, Theseus draws a connection between three seemingly unrelated persons: the lunatic, the lover, and the poet. He holds that the three “are of imagination all compact” (5.1.8). Once again, Theseus reveals that he manifests some deeper knowledge, since the three persons are indeed related in their ability to dream. Lunatics think dreams represent reality; lovers dream about the people they love; and poets dream of a world beyond the physical world and make it accessible to people through language. While Theseus speaks the truth, he still does not seem to latch onto to the value of dreaming and imagination yet. By contrast, Shakespeare revels in such a world of fancy.
In fact, at the very end of his play, Shakespeare warns the audience through the character of Robin to accept the play as a mere dream. The scene indeed reflects the themes surrounding the play within the play. Robin poetically explains, “If we shadows have offended, / Think but this, and all is mended: / That you have but slumbered here, / While these visions did appear” (5.2.1-5). In this instance, Shakespeare shows the audience how he has taken them on a journey into his dream world in the form of his play. Acting in the role of the poet, Shakespeare transcends physical boundaries and taps into his imagination to create an illusory world in his play. Just like his art transcends reality, his play takes his audience away from reality for awhile. As a poet, Shakespeare emphasizes the necessity of dreaming for the creation of art. He suggests that imagining alternate realities, such as the woods, can yield a work of art. Indeed, Shakespeare creates his play from his own imaginings, reflections, and dreams.
While Theseus describes his rejection of imagination directly following Quince’s prologue, he actually revises his thoughts on imaginations in the middle of the small play. Theseus tells Hippolyta, “If we imagine no worse than they of them-/selves, they may pass for excellent men. Here comes two noble beasts in: a man and a lion” (5.1.211-213). Essentially, Theseus becomes immersed in the imaginative world of the play; he succumbs to its entertainment and leaves his world of reason for awhile, trusting in the actors. The scene marks the transformation of Theseus’ character; before, he never willingly accepts the “tricks” which imagination plays (5.1.18). Now, however, Theseus recognizes the need for imagination to believe in the ridiculous actions of the play, if only temporarily.
Shakespeare, of course, emerges victorious in convincing a non-believer to reassess the world of dreams and to eventually believe in the strength of the imagination. In A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare uses Quince’s prologue to revisit the concepts of imagination and dreaming, specifically as they apply to romantic love and the creation of art. Ultimately, Theseus and the audience alike recognize the transforming characteristics of imagination. Moreover, the audience better understands the interaction between performers and audience during a play, acknowledging the manner in which performers introduce the audience to an alternative world. Theseus’ words concerning the poet ring true, especially at the end, when Shakespeare begs the audience to think of the play as a dreamlike experience. Overall, the audience admits, the play itself seems to be a vision or concoction of one of Shakespeare’s own nighttime dreams.
Greenblatt, Stephen, et al., eds. Essential Plays [&] the Sonnets. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1997.
Save Citation » (Works with EndNote, ProCite, & Reference Manager)
Richter, N. L. (2010). "A Midsummer Night's Dream: Imagination, Romantic Love, and the Creation of Art." Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 2(01). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=130MLA
Richter, Natasha L. "A Midsummer Night's Dream: Imagination, Romantic Love, and the Creation of Art." Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse 2.01 (2010). <http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=130>Chicago 16th
Richter, Natasha L. 2010. A Midsummer Night's Dream: Imagination, Romantic Love, and the Creation of Art. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse 2 (01), http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=130Harvard
RICHTER, N. L. 2010. A Midsummer Night's Dream: Imagination, Romantic Love, and the Creation of Art. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse [Online], 2. Available: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=130